—— 请按键盘 空白键 开始游戏 ——

关于语言的名人名言哲理格言警句语录 - 每日文摘
语言
When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only say what I wish done," give him a lollipop.
It is not a language's weakness but its strengths that control the gradient of its change: Alas, a language never escapes its embryonic sac.
In a 5 year period we get one superb programming language. Only we can't control when the 5 year period will be.
If we believe in data structures, we must believe in independent (hence simultaneous) processing. For why else would we collect items within a structure? Why do we tolerate languages that give us the one without the other?
In English every word can be verbed. Would that it were so in our programming languages.
Giving up on assembly language was the apple in our Garden of Eden: Languages whose use squanders machine cycles are sinful. The LISP machine now permits LISP programmers to abandon bra and fig-leaf.
Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress.
Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded middle.
There will always be things we wish to say in our programs that in all known languages can only be said poorly.
A good system can't have a weak command language.
A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing.
A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.