关于告诉的名人名言哲理格言警句语录 - 每日文摘
告诉
这是一份非常艰难的工作,我不仅指CEO的工作,创业本身就很难,建立一家初创公司没有什么容易的,我甚至不明白为什么有人会第二次创业,创业是一种磨难,我会试图劝阻人们再次创业,因为我创办了两家公司,第二次创业时,我会问自己,你确定要这样做吗?不。毫无疑问,你不应该这样做,必须有一种遗忘的机制,必须忘记它有多么艰难,我不知道我是如何做到的,我忘记了创业的痛苦和煎熬。一旦你取得了一些成就,你就会继续迈向下一个目标。我喜欢我们公司的一件事就是我们不断重塑自己,我们就像公司内部的创业者一样,我参加的所有会议都像创业会议一样,都很痛苦,因为你从0开始,你没有任何动力,基本上你是从0开始的,每一次都会让我想起它有多么痛苦,但是当你建立了一些东西,并且你为之付出努力的人们赞赏它,而且它确实产生了影响时,这也是如此令人满足,然后你将这种能力与其他技能和能力结合起来,你就可以做得更大。所以,一方面,我会告诉他们创立一家公司是非常有回报的,你能够与很多人一起工作,这是真的;另一方面,创业的痛苦和煎熬是你无法想象的。所以,你又是脆弱的。所以我不知道我给他们提供了什么智慧,如果你决心要做,就别等太久,在你失去无知之前去做。因此,你必须有足够的决心坚持自己的信念;另一方面,你不能固执己见,你必须具备灵活性,不断学习,在这两者的平衡中,我相信我所做的事情,同时我也相信自己可能是错的,这是一种奇怪的状态,你必须同样坚信这两者。
我其实想要一家更小的公司,而不是更大的公司。通常公司需要尽可能大才能做好很多工作,但也要尽可能小。如果想要一个服从命令和控制的组织,那么你就把它做成一个金字塔,就像罗马帝国时期的旧军队一样。但如果你想赋予人们权利,就要尽可能地让它变得平坦,这样信息传播得更快。为了使组织结构尽可能平坦,必须充分考虑第一层。第一层恰好是资深工作人员,他们需要的管理最少,我的管理团队中没有一个人会来找我寻求工作建议,他们自己就做得很好。有很多人向我汇报工作,我不需要一对一进行指导。他们都非常快乐,他们知道自己在做什么,且都是各自领域的专家,所以那些一对一的交流真的没有必要。如果有一个重要的战略方向,你为什么要告诉一个人?你得告诉所有人。因此,当我们在制定未来的发展战略时,我会在某个时间发送给所有人,然后他们会给我反馈,我们再完善它。公司的管理是扁平化的,而且你已经对公司十分了解,再加上给员工充分授权去访问公司的信息,这样公司也很敏捷。事实证明,通过很多直接下属,而不是一对一,能使公司管理扁平化,信息传播更快、更通畅。我们没有业务部门,也没有分歧,每个人都像一个人一样工作。公司的运行方式使我们能够快速构建加速计算。如果你让我去做炸鸡,或者瑞典肉丸,肯定没有机会,但是在加速计算领域,我们就可以做得很好。
In a way, if you like, at one end of the spectrum of sympathy, you've got the tabloid newspaper. At the other end of the spectrum, you've got tragedy and tragic art. And I suppose I'm arguing that we should learn a little bit about what's happening in tragic art. It would be insane to call Hamlet a loser. He is not a loser, though he has lost. And I think that is the message of tragedy to us, and why it's so very, very important, I think.
There's a real correlation between a society that tells people that they can do anything, and the existence of low self-esteem. So that's another way in which something quite positive can have a nasty kickback. There is another reason why we might be feeling more anxious --about our careers, about our status in the world today, than ever before. And it's, again, linked to something nice. And that nice thing is called meritocracy.
The consequences of this problem make themselves felt in bookshops. When you go to a large bookshop and look at the self-help sections, as I sometimes do -- if you analyze self-help book sproduced in the world today, there are basically two kinds. The first kind tells you, "You can do it! You can make it! Anything's possible!" The other kind tells you how to cope with what we politely call "low self-esteem," or impolitely call, "feeling very bad about yourself."
We're told, from many sources, that any onecan achieve anything. We've done away with the caste system, we are now in a system where anyone can rise to any position they please. And it's a beautiful idea. Along with that is a kind of spirit of equality; we're all basically equal. There are no strictly defined hierarchies. There is one really big problem with this, and that problem is envy.